Saturday July 4, 2009
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:54 PM CDT
Group urges support for veto override
North Iowans participating in a vigil at U.S. Rep. Tom Latham’s Clear Lake office Tuesday listen to Charlie Wishman, of the Iowa Citizen Action Network, talk about the need to encourage Latham to vote to override President George W. Bush’s veto of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) Reauthorization Act. KRISTIN BUEHNER/The Globe Gazette
CLEAR LAKE — A group of about 20 North Iowans carried signs and spoke outside the Clear Lake office of U.S. Rep. Tom Latham Tuesday.

They thanked the Alexander Republican for his vote in favor of extending the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and asking him symbolically to vote Thursday to override President George Bush’s veto.

“Our message to (Latham) is he needs to stick to his principles,” said Mason City native Charlie Wishman, event organizer for the Iowa Citizen Action Network out of Des Moines.

Reauthorization of the bill would cost an estimated $35 billion, he said.

Carrying red, white and black signs saying “Billions for Iraq War, Veto for Kids’ Healthcare?” and “Don’t Hitch Your Wagon to Bush,” the group demonstrated quietly on behalf of SCHIP, known here as Healthy and Well Kids in Iowa (HAWK-I).

Among the people who spoke was Sandy Christ, a former Clear Lake teacher and current member of the Clear Lake School Board.

She said the SCHIP legislation enabled the school district to capture some Medicaid funds to help children with special needs. “If this legislation is not passed, there’s a chance the state would lose $1.2 million in Medicaid to help children stay healthy,” she said.

“This bill that was passed was a bipartisan bill and then to have him (Bush) veto it,” Christ continued. “How can you be against something that’s supposed to be for our children?”

“I believe being proactive is a lot more cost-effective,” Christ said. “If you consider the amount of money being asked for to extend this bill, you would take away a week or two of spending for the Iraq war and you’d have this bill pretty much paid for.”

Alan Anderson of Mason City, president of the United Steelworkers Local 9310 and president of the North Iowa 9 Labor Council, said 4 million more children would have access to health care if Congress reauthorizes the SCHIP legislation.

“Six-point-six million will be at risk of losing their health insurance if the president succeeds in blocking reauthorization,” he said. “Congress must stand with children and not the president.”

Among the others who came to show his support for SCHIP was James Berge of Kensett.

“I just think that it’s something that needs to be addressed,” he said. “What does it say about us as a nation if we don’t take care of our children?”


User Comments - 5 comment(s)

Post Your Comments On This Story
*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Click here to create an account.

Please submit your comment only once. Your comment will be posted immediately after submission. By submitting this form you agree to our Comment Policy & Privacy Policy.

Comment Policy: (hide)
Globegazette.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments are moderated periodically and will be deleted if found inappropriate. We will not edit or alter your comments, but will delete those that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:
  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.
  • Referrals to other Web addresses.
  • E-mail addresses
(hide)
globegazette.com Privacy Policy: (hide)
Welcome to the web sites of the Globe Gazette, a media company located in eastern Iowa. We believe in your right to know what information is collected during your visit to our web sites and how the information is used and safeguarded.

Information Gathered by Voluntary Submission
To make use of certain features on our websites (such as contests, story comments, personalized web pages and other interactive forums) visitors need to register and to provide certain information as part of the registration or participation process. (We may ask, for example, for your name, email address, sex, age, and zip code, and we might request information on your interest in sports, personal finance, the performing arts, and the like.)

The information you supply will help us to offer you more personalized features, to tailor our sites to your interests and make them more useful to you. The more you tell us about yourself, the more value we can offer you. Supplying such information is entirely voluntary. But if you don't supply the information we need, we may be unable to provide you with services we make available to other visitors to our sites. Of course, even if you want to remain completely anonymous, you're still free to take advantage of the wealth of content available on our sites without registration.

Information Automatically Gathered About All Visitors
We collect aggregate and user-specific information on what pages consumers access or visit. This information is used to generate reports that help the Globe Gazette assess the value of and interest in the various web sites. The information we collect is used by us to improve the content of our web page. We can build a better site if we know which pages our users are visiting and how often.

Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address but not the e-mail address, when you visit our sites. Your IP address does not identify you personally. We use this information to deliver our web pages to you upon request, to tailor our sites to the interests of our users, and to measure traffic within our sites.

To help make our sites more responsive to the needs of our visitors, we may utilize a standard feature of browser software, called a "cookie". The cookie doesn't actually identify the visitor, just the computer that a visitor uses to access our site. A cookie can't read data off your hard drive. Our advertisers or content partners may also assign their own cookies to your browser, a process that we cannot control. We use cookies to help us tailor our site to your needs, to deliver a better, more personalized service. It is a cookie, for example, that allows us to deliver your personalized stock quotes each time you visit a site.

Information Shared With Other Organizations
When we present information to our advertisers -- to help them understand our audience and confirm the value of advertising on our websites -- it is usually in the form of aggregated statistics on traffic to various pages within our sites. We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information.

Special Attention to Children
Children should always get permission from their parents before sending any information about themselves (such as their names, email addresses, and phone numbers) over the Internet, to us or to anyone else. We do not specifically collect information about children. We encourage parents to review and share safety tips with their children participating in the online experience.

A final note:
The Globe Gazette is affiliated with other online companies, some of which feature our branding. This policy statement does not apply to those companies' web sites; please refer to these affiliated sites to obtain information on their privacy policies. If you can't find the privacy policy of any of these sites via a link from the site's homepage, you should contact the site directly for more information.

The Web is an evolving medium. If we need to change our privacy policy at some point in the future, we'll post the changes before they take effect. Of course, our use of information gathered while the current policy is in effect will always be consistent with the current policy, even if we change that policy later.

(hide)

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please make sure to identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

The Globe Gazette provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. For an explanation of our policy of appropriate postings, please see our Rules of the Road.

Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

Rules of the Road: (hide)
Blog administrators and moderators have the right to edit, delete, move or close any comment or forum at any time. The following rules and guidelines clarify our practices and provide an explanation of what content may lead to message deletion and/or user bans.

Play nice: Messages containing intentionally misleading information, defamatory content, threats, verbal abuse, harassment, obscenity or personal information about other individuals are not allowed. Comments should be brief and stick to either generally known facts or the facts contained in a news story. Keep a civil tone. Resist making personal attacks or indulging in name-calling. If your item doesn't get posted or is deleted, tone it down a bit and try again.

Keep your posts commercial-free: Advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes and solicitations are unacceptable.

Spam is not allowed: Spamming includes multiple disruptive, meaningless or repetitive messages, or messages posted solely for solicitation. Messages considered spam, trolling or flaming (as determined by the sole discretion of the moderator) can be deleted without warning or explanation.

User Accounts: Registered user names must follow the same rules as forum posts. Any user accounts considered objectionable or created for the purpose of spamming or promoting commercial interests may be deleted. Deliberate or continued abuse of user accounts will result in a ban of the user's IP address.

Signatures: All content posted in the user's signature field must follow the same rules as forum messages and user accounts.

Fair Use: Do not post entire articles into comments or forums. This is a potential violation of copyright laws. It's unnecessary and results in needlessly long posts. Instead, post a brief abstract of the material and a link to the complete source. If you are not sure how much of an article you can legally post, please simply post a link to the material.

Don't see a message you posted earlier? Administrators may move messages to more relevant forums. If you recently posted a message and cannot find it anywhere, the message may have been deleted because of objectionable content. Feel free to try again or contact the moderator for details.

What to do if your account has been banned: If you try to login and receive a message that you've been banned, do not immediately open another user account and continue the inappropriate behavior. Such action could result in a permanent ban. Instead, contact the administrator and find out what caused the sanction. We may or may not reinstate your privileges after such a contact.
(hide)
Showing The Last 5 comment(s) Comments On This Story

rusty shackelford wrote on Oct 17, 2007 10:50 PM:

" Why is it when the democratic congress wants an increase in spending and they do not get the increase they call it a cut? If you ask for a 10% raise and only get 7%, don’t tell me your funding is going to be cut by 3%. THAT IS THE CASE HERE !! There are no funding cuts. "

JB Johnson of Britt wrote on Oct 17, 2007 9:18 AM:

" Just think if every government spending program were to send you a bill. I'm going to remind you people who want this you are spending your kids social security trust fund on this. The bill will come due sooner than you think. Can you spell tax increase? "

PS wrote on Oct 17, 2007 7:53 AM:

" I'm with you, "willingworker". Isn't Bush's big complaint that the financial qualifications for the care was so high, like $80,000 per year? Both my husband and I work hard, have our own insurance and we don't make 80K per year. I'm responsible for my own health insurance for my family. That limit is way too high. That, I believe is partly why Bush wanted to veto it. Am I wrong? "

Ezekiel wrote on Oct 17, 2007 7:48 AM:

" Bush is a moron. We NEED socialized medicine! NO kid should be without medical coverage. I am an idiot for voting for Bush! "

willing worker wrote on Oct 17, 2007 7:17 AM:

" THis veto should stand. I don't agree with most of Pres. Bush's ideas, but I do believe taking children out of private health care and putting them in government programs is a good idea. I've read a bit about this program though not enough to understand all the nuances. First of all, what is the cut off? THis is a means tested program. WHat are the parameters? Who qualifies? Define poor. Second, are there limitations on whether or not your immigration status determines elegibility? Does this program cover children from anywhere in the world who can beg, borrow, or steal a ride here to obtain free healthcare for a sick child? These are my tax dollars you are proposing to spend. Explain to me who qualifies. "

Show 10 latest comments only
Advertisement