Venturabats wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:00 PM:
" Well thank God he didn't order a cup of hot coffee too. "
Big Picture wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:48 PM:
" To the comments supporting this action. Put yourself on the jury and tell me, what are the actual damages? Outside of finding it disgusting, how did effect the plantiff? He did not eat, nor have any physical contact with the spit. Also, the civil suit only allows for monutary awards, as some thought there should be some punishment to the kids. The kids are not named in the lawsuit. This is all about money for nothing. "
sunshine wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:45 PM:
" I would sue too, thats gross those kids should have gotten more than fired. McDonalds has plenty of money too pay up.
"
Tired and Saddened wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:26 PM:
" I am so very tired of and so very saddened by all of you being so critical of law enforcement! Just because they are in law enforcement or in the public eye all the time, you seem to think they should have to withstand everything you say about them or accuse them of. In it for the money; you darn right he should be!!!In this day of deadly diseases, I don't honestly think 20 million dollars is enough to compensate the incredible personal anguish Officer Douglas had to bear, and then you bash him about it to boot. There have been so many times in the last year or two that the people in law enforcement or those running for public office have weathered such incredibly vicious, spiteful,hateful, sick and disgusting, personal attacks because someone doesn't like them or wants to get back at them for calling attention to the attacker's immoral, shameful, and sometimes crimial behavior.If vindictive people are so bold as to attack people in law enforcement or in positions of authority, they certainly will not think twice about an attack on little old you or me. Then I bet it would be a different story. What do you think should happen if an inmate was served a spitty, snotty sandwich. I am sure most of you would say how terrible that was. I'll bet there would be a lawsuit then! And not just against the person(s) who did it, but the county or state as well because they are the employer. You can't have it both ways people. It's high time good, honest, decent citizens stand together and hold these accusers and attackers responsible!!! And yes, someone who spits in a sandwich being served to someone else IS an attacker!!! "
Too fat wrote on Jun 1, 2007 6:33 PM:
" If the officer thought anything about his health he would not be eating that dog food in the first place. It's about the money. "
Had Enough! wrote on Jun 1, 2007 4:14 PM:
" Way to go Disgusted - you hit the nail on the head! Shame on all of you for assuming that this officer and his attorney are doing this for the $$$. Pictures don't lie and these pictures are disgusting.
Apparently Mr. Douglas and his attorney have given McDonalds enough time to step up to the plate. It is apparent that McDonalds did not think this was serious. Sure the boys lost their jobs, but they should have put signs on these two punks and put them on a busy street corner. The sign would read...I worked in fast food and spit on people's food. Let the public bash these two morons for a week.
After they are done being humiliated, make them do some community service like picking up garbage in ditches along the interstate for a month.
Termination from McDonalds and a slap on the hand are not enough for them. These children need to be held responsible for what they did and need to be taught respect for the job they do. In this day and age with the threat of AIDS and HIV, the risk of being in contact with someone’s bodily fluids is dangerous and it shocks me to think people are not concerned about this matter.
Come on public - how many times have you been in a restaurant and seen someone cough around your food, wipe their nose, or or come back from the restroom and you're wondering if they washed their hands. "
R. Crum wrote on Jun 1, 2007 1:54 PM:
" I am glad this has come into the public light. I am tired of going into an establishment that thinks so little of their customers that they have left children in charge. Sometimes we forget that at age 16 or 17, life experiance and brain developement have not come as far in some kids as in others. I have know teenagers that have a lot on the ball. But for every one of them, I have met 2 that are still lacking in maturity. If an employer is not aware of which brand of child he is leaving in charge, he needs to have a friend go in and check it out at odd times. Obviously the manager of this McDonald's wasn't paying attention. I think that holds true of some "adult" employees, too. If you are "helped" by rude service or ignored by chatting employees or if your food is suspect, please contact the manager so they have the choice of how they are represented. "
Goldenthroat wrote on Jun 1, 2007 1:24 PM:
" I have been around long enough to kmow that when some one says its not about the money, ITS ABOUT THE MONEY!!! "
disgusted wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:18 AM:
" Shame on all of you who are critical of this officer and his attorney for bringing this disgusting situation to the attention of not only McDonald's but also the public. Many of you infer that because it happened to a police officer, it's okay; I'm sure you'd feel differently if you found it in one of your kid's Happy Meals!! But, of course, as long as they just say "sorry about that" we should forget about it. I bet even those of you who believe this is a frivolous lawsuit will think twice the next time you bite into a sandwich from McDonald's. "
wondering wrote on Jun 1, 2007 10:13 AM:
" I have to ask, how many of you have thought twice this past week about eating food from McDonald's? I have. It makes me sick to even think of it. Does this mean I can sue McDonalds and KIMT (for showing the sandwich so much)? "
"SHOW ME THE MONEY" wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:38 AM:
" First off this is what CHARLES CITY POLICE OFFICER DOUGLAS and his lawyer is all about! I hope (for Charles City citizens) that he is not an individual thinking person, because that is the worst type of police officer we want working the street.
I agree with "Confused" Anne, Kyle and "Jeez".
You notified Mcdonalds and they fired the people, you got an apology from one of the adult workers and then were offered money and you turned them down.
Shame on you. Don't blow smoke and make yourself more of a victim, because people that are true victims of crime are the ones we should focus on not you.
You say it is hard for you to go out to eat now, well I almost got hit by a car so should I be scared to go out and drive or better off sue the other driver. Wake up Douglas it is your choice to go out to eat or stay home.
If you were not doing this for the money then you would have sued for $1 then made it public to hold Mcdonalds accountable (after the workers were fired and you got an apology).
I end with a concern. The video on KIMT showed a police car camera. When did the City of Charles City allow for their equipment to be used in this fashion? I never heard that there was a criminal investigation, so why was there a video of the apology
"
Say What!?!?!? wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:42 AM:
" Come on now, Officer, it's not about the money.... yeah... Like I believe that. If it weren't about the money... then you would have settled for whatever amount McDonald's was willing to pay you in the past year. Because if it weren't about the money, then you would have had the satisfaction of knowing that McDonald's has learned a valuable lesson and perhaps they would better screen some of their employees. Which brings up another valuable point... where has it been McDonald's fault other than the fact that they hired a couple of kids to work in one of their restaraunts who weren't quite honorable. This happens every day. Ask any employer. I have not heard anyone bring up the fact that these two boys learned this behavior from watching a movie. Well, Officer, perhaps you should also sue the creators of this movie. I mean... come on.... the boys might never have thought of doing this if they hadn't of watch this movie. Do you really believe you are the first officer this happened to? Kids are always reenacting scenes from movies they have watched. I guess what concerns me the most is the fact that no harm was done to you and still you feel the need to continue this lawsuit against McDonald's. Yes, I believe something should have been done... and according to the article there was something done.... the 2 boys were fired... and you received an apology from one of the boys (and why you didn't receive one from the other boy is a matter to be taken up with his parents). The bottom line here is this... If it weren't about the money... then this would all be over and hopefully two boys would have learned a valuable lesson and we as the public would have become aware of what our children are learning from watching the movies and perhaps we might screen what they are watching. "
Big D from Wisconsin wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:16 AM:
" Comments from persons who made previous comments, critical you can be but the atttorney is only doing what his client asks of him. And I have worked in fast food, if you only know what goes on. I think that McDonalds should have had better supervision and I know with all the diseases going on in this country, saliva is the last thing I want on my sandwich, when will the kids of today take responsibilty for their stupidity along with the employers that hire these kids and poor supervision. "