Sunday July 20, 2008
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Friday, June 1, 2007 12:12 AM CDT
Charles City cop sues over fast-food sandwich he says was slimed
CHARLES CITY (AP) — A police officer who claims his chicken sandwich was slimed by two teenage employees at a McDonald’s restaurant is suing the fast- food company.

Officer Josh Douglas said he was working nights two years ago and went through the McDonald’s drive-through in Charles City. He ordered a chicken sandwich, which came with lettuce and tomato.

Not liking vegetables, Douglas said he went to remove the toppings and discovered what he described as a mucousy substance holding them together.

“Fortunately, I don’t like lettuce. Because if I did I would have at least taken one bite before I realized what was the matter,” he said.

Douglas and another officer went inside the restaurant, where they found two teenagers working. The employees said they were imitating a prank in a movie in which a state trooper orders a burger and the cook spits phlegm on it.

Both boys were fired and one of them later apologized to Douglas, records show.

Douglas and his attorney, Joel Yunek of Mason City, say they have negotiated with McDonald’s for more than a year but have been unable to reach a settlement. They filed a lawsuit on May 8 in Floyd County District Court.

Yunek said they aren’t looking “for the world.”

“But certainly ... he is deserving of an apology. Certainly, he is deserving of some kind of compensation,” Yunek said.

Douglas said it’s not about money but about accountability and to ensure the restaurant takes measures to ensure their employees are handling food properly.

Sam Soifer, the owner of the Charles City franchise, said in a written statement to the media that the restaurant took immediate action to fire the employees and that McDonald’s takes food safety seriously.


User Comments - 13 comment(s)

Post Your Comments On This Story
*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Click here to create an account.

Please submit your comment only once. Your comment will be posted immediately after submission. By submitting this form you agree to our Comment Policy & Privacy Policy.

Comment Policy: (hide)
Globegazette.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted go into a queue to be moderated, and if posted after midnight, may take several hours before they appear on the site. We will not edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to delete or refuse to post comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:
  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.
  • Referrals to other Web addresses.
  • E-mail addresses
(hide)
globegazette.com Privacy Policy: (hide)
Welcome to the web sites of the Globe Gazette, a media company located in eastern Iowa. We believe in your right to know what information is collected during your visit to our web sites and how the information is used and safeguarded.

Information Gathered by Voluntary Submission
To make use of certain features on our websites (such as contests, story comments, personalized web pages and other interactive forums) visitors need to register and to provide certain information as part of the registration or participation process. (We may ask, for example, for your name, email address, sex, age, and zip code, and we might request information on your interest in sports, personal finance, the performing arts, and the like.)

The information you supply will help us to offer you more personalized features, to tailor our sites to your interests and make them more useful to you. The more you tell us about yourself, the more value we can offer you. Supplying such information is entirely voluntary. But if you don't supply the information we need, we may be unable to provide you with services we make available to other visitors to our sites. Of course, even if you want to remain completely anonymous, you're still free to take advantage of the wealth of content available on our sites without registration.

Information Automatically Gathered About All Visitors
We collect aggregate and user-specific information on what pages consumers access or visit. This information is used to generate reports that help the Globe Gazette assess the value of and interest in the various web sites. The information we collect is used by us to improve the content of our web page. We can build a better site if we know which pages our users are visiting and how often.

Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address but not the e-mail address, when you visit our sites. Your IP address does not identify you personally. We use this information to deliver our web pages to you upon request, to tailor our sites to the interests of our users, and to measure traffic within our sites.

To help make our sites more responsive to the needs of our visitors, we may utilize a standard feature of browser software, called a "cookie". The cookie doesn't actually identify the visitor, just the computer that a visitor uses to access our site. A cookie can't read data off your hard drive. Our advertisers or content partners may also assign their own cookies to your browser, a process that we cannot control. We use cookies to help us tailor our site to your needs, to deliver a better, more personalized service. It is a cookie, for example, that allows us to deliver your personalized stock quotes each time you visit a site.

Information Shared With Other Organizations
When we present information to our advertisers -- to help them understand our audience and confirm the value of advertising on our websites -- it is usually in the form of aggregated statistics on traffic to various pages within our sites. We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information.

Special Attention to Children
Children should always get permission from their parents before sending any information about themselves (such as their names, email addresses, and phone numbers) over the Internet, to us or to anyone else. We do not specifically collect information about children. We encourage parents to review and share safety tips with their children participating in the online experience.

A final note:
The Globe Gazette is affiliated with other online companies, some of which feature our branding. This policy statement does not apply to those companies' web sites; please refer to these affiliated sites to obtain information on their privacy policies. If you can't find the privacy policy of any of these sites via a link from the site's homepage, you should contact the site directly for more information.

The Web is an evolving medium. If we need to change our privacy policy at some point in the future, we'll post the changes before they take effect. Of course, our use of information gathered while the current policy is in effect will always be consistent with the current policy, even if we change that policy later.

(hide)

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please make sure to identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

The Globe Gazette provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. For an explanation of our policy of appropriate postings, please see our Rules of the Road.

Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

Rules of the Road: (hide)
Blog administrators and moderators have the right to edit, delete, move or close any comment or forum at any time. The following rules and guidelines clarify our practices and provide an explanation of what content may lead to message deletion and/or user bans.

Play nice: Messages containing intentionally misleading information, defamatory content, threats, verbal abuse, harassment, obscenity or personal information about other individuals are not allowed. Comments should be brief and stick to either generally known facts or the facts contained in a news story. Keep a civil tone. Resist making personal attacks or indulging in name-calling. If your item doesn't get posted or is deleted, tone it down a bit and try again.

Keep your posts commercial-free: Advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes and solicitations are unacceptable.

Spam is not allowed: Spamming includes multiple disruptive, meaningless or repetitive messages, or messages posted solely for solicitation. Messages considered spam, trolling or flaming (as determined by the sole discretion of the moderator) can be deleted without warning or explanation.

User Accounts: Registered user names must follow the same rules as forum posts. Any user accounts considered objectionable or created for the purpose of spamming or promoting commercial interests may be deleted. Deliberate or continued abuse of user accounts will result in a ban of the user's IP address.

Signatures: All content posted in the user's signature field must follow the same rules as forum messages and user accounts.

Fair Use: Do not post entire articles into comments or forums. This is a potential violation of copyright laws. It's unnecessary and results in needlessly long posts. Instead, post a brief abstract of the material and a link to the complete source. If you are not sure how much of an article you can legally post, please simply post a link to the material.

Don't see a message you posted earlier? Administrators may move messages to more relevant forums. If you recently posted a message and cannot find it anywhere, the message may have been deleted because of objectionable content. Feel free to try again or contact the moderator for details.

What to do if your account has been banned: If you try to login and receive a message that you've been banned, do not immediately open another user account and continue the inappropriate behavior. Such action could result in a permanent ban. Instead, contact the administrator and find out what caused the sanction. We may or may not reinstate your privileges after such a contact.
(hide)
Showing The Last 13 comment(s) Comments On This Story

Venturabats wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:00 PM:

" Well thank God he didn't order a cup of hot coffee too. "

Big Picture wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:48 PM:

" To the comments supporting this action. Put yourself on the jury and tell me, what are the actual damages? Outside of finding it disgusting, how did effect the plantiff? He did not eat, nor have any physical contact with the spit. Also, the civil suit only allows for monutary awards, as some thought there should be some punishment to the kids. The kids are not named in the lawsuit. This is all about money for nothing. "

sunshine wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:45 PM:

" I would sue too, thats gross those kids should have gotten more than fired. McDonalds has plenty of money too pay up. "

Tired and Saddened wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:26 PM:

" I am so very tired of and so very saddened by all of you being so critical of law enforcement! Just because they are in law enforcement or in the public eye all the time, you seem to think they should have to withstand everything you say about them or accuse them of. In it for the money; you darn right he should be!!!In this day of deadly diseases, I don't honestly think 20 million dollars is enough to compensate the incredible personal anguish Officer Douglas had to bear, and then you bash him about it to boot. There have been so many times in the last year or two that the people in law enforcement or those running for public office have weathered such incredibly vicious, spiteful,hateful, sick and disgusting, personal attacks because someone doesn't like them or wants to get back at them for calling attention to the attacker's immoral, shameful, and sometimes crimial behavior.If vindictive people are so bold as to attack people in law enforcement or in positions of authority, they certainly will not think twice about an attack on little old you or me. Then I bet it would be a different story. What do you think should happen if an inmate was served a spitty, snotty sandwich. I am sure most of you would say how terrible that was. I'll bet there would be a lawsuit then! And not just against the person(s) who did it, but the county or state as well because they are the employer. You can't have it both ways people. It's high time good, honest, decent citizens stand together and hold these accusers and attackers responsible!!! And yes, someone who spits in a sandwich being served to someone else IS an attacker!!! "

Too fat wrote on Jun 1, 2007 6:33 PM:

" If the officer thought anything about his health he would not be eating that dog food in the first place. It's about the money. "

Had Enough! wrote on Jun 1, 2007 4:14 PM:

" Way to go Disgusted - you hit the nail on the head! Shame on all of you for assuming that this officer and his attorney are doing this for the $$$. Pictures don't lie and these pictures are disgusting. Apparently Mr. Douglas and his attorney have given McDonalds enough time to step up to the plate. It is apparent that McDonalds did not think this was serious. Sure the boys lost their jobs, but they should have put signs on these two punks and put them on a busy street corner. The sign would read...I worked in fast food and spit on people's food. Let the public bash these two morons for a week. After they are done being humiliated, make them do some community service like picking up garbage in ditches along the interstate for a month. Termination from McDonalds and a slap on the hand are not enough for them. These children need to be held responsible for what they did and need to be taught respect for the job they do. In this day and age with the threat of AIDS and HIV, the risk of being in contact with someone’s bodily fluids is dangerous and it shocks me to think people are not concerned about this matter. Come on public - how many times have you been in a restaurant and seen someone cough around your food, wipe their nose, or or come back from the restroom and you're wondering if they washed their hands. "

R. Crum wrote on Jun 1, 2007 1:54 PM:

" I am glad this has come into the public light. I am tired of going into an establishment that thinks so little of their customers that they have left children in charge. Sometimes we forget that at age 16 or 17, life experiance and brain developement have not come as far in some kids as in others. I have know teenagers that have a lot on the ball. But for every one of them, I have met 2 that are still lacking in maturity. If an employer is not aware of which brand of child he is leaving in charge, he needs to have a friend go in and check it out at odd times. Obviously the manager of this McDonald's wasn't paying attention. I think that holds true of some "adult" employees, too. If you are "helped" by rude service or ignored by chatting employees or if your food is suspect, please contact the manager so they have the choice of how they are represented. "

Goldenthroat wrote on Jun 1, 2007 1:24 PM:

" I have been around long enough to kmow that when some one says its not about the money, ITS ABOUT THE MONEY!!! "

disgusted wrote on Jun 1, 2007 11:18 AM:

" Shame on all of you who are critical of this officer and his attorney for bringing this disgusting situation to the attention of not only McDonald's but also the public. Many of you infer that because it happened to a police officer, it's okay; I'm sure you'd feel differently if you found it in one of your kid's Happy Meals!! But, of course, as long as they just say "sorry about that" we should forget about it. I bet even those of you who believe this is a frivolous lawsuit will think twice the next time you bite into a sandwich from McDonald's. "

wondering wrote on Jun 1, 2007 10:13 AM:

" I have to ask, how many of you have thought twice this past week about eating food from McDonald's? I have. It makes me sick to even think of it. Does this mean I can sue McDonalds and KIMT (for showing the sandwich so much)? "

"SHOW ME THE MONEY" wrote on Jun 1, 2007 8:38 AM:

" First off this is what CHARLES CITY POLICE OFFICER DOUGLAS and his lawyer is all about! I hope (for Charles City citizens) that he is not an individual thinking person, because that is the worst type of police officer we want working the street. I agree with "Confused" Anne, Kyle and "Jeez". You notified Mcdonalds and they fired the people, you got an apology from one of the adult workers and then were offered money and you turned them down. Shame on you. Don't blow smoke and make yourself more of a victim, because people that are true victims of crime are the ones we should focus on not you. You say it is hard for you to go out to eat now, well I almost got hit by a car so should I be scared to go out and drive or better off sue the other driver. Wake up Douglas it is your choice to go out to eat or stay home. If you were not doing this for the money then you would have sued for $1 then made it public to hold Mcdonalds accountable (after the workers were fired and you got an apology). I end with a concern. The video on KIMT showed a police car camera. When did the City of Charles City allow for their equipment to be used in this fashion? I never heard that there was a criminal investigation, so why was there a video of the apology "

Say What!?!?!? wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:42 AM:

" Come on now, Officer, it's not about the money.... yeah... Like I believe that. If it weren't about the money... then you would have settled for whatever amount McDonald's was willing to pay you in the past year. Because if it weren't about the money, then you would have had the satisfaction of knowing that McDonald's has learned a valuable lesson and perhaps they would better screen some of their employees. Which brings up another valuable point... where has it been McDonald's fault other than the fact that they hired a couple of kids to work in one of their restaraunts who weren't quite honorable. This happens every day. Ask any employer. I have not heard anyone bring up the fact that these two boys learned this behavior from watching a movie. Well, Officer, perhaps you should also sue the creators of this movie. I mean... come on.... the boys might never have thought of doing this if they hadn't of watch this movie. Do you really believe you are the first officer this happened to? Kids are always reenacting scenes from movies they have watched. I guess what concerns me the most is the fact that no harm was done to you and still you feel the need to continue this lawsuit against McDonald's. Yes, I believe something should have been done... and according to the article there was something done.... the 2 boys were fired... and you received an apology from one of the boys (and why you didn't receive one from the other boy is a matter to be taken up with his parents). The bottom line here is this... If it weren't about the money... then this would all be over and hopefully two boys would have learned a valuable lesson and we as the public would have become aware of what our children are learning from watching the movies and perhaps we might screen what they are watching. "

Big D from Wisconsin wrote on Jun 1, 2007 7:16 AM:

" Comments from persons who made previous comments, critical you can be but the atttorney is only doing what his client asks of him. And I have worked in fast food, if you only know what goes on. I think that McDonalds should have had better supervision and I know with all the diseases going on in this country, saliva is the last thing I want on my sandwich, when will the kids of today take responsibilty for their stupidity along with the employers that hire these kids and poor supervision. "

Show 10 latest comments only
Advertisement